COUNTY RD 1025 over OSBORNE BR
Map
Coordinates:
+37.60694, -93.8920437°36'25" N, 93°53'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 1025 over OSBORNE BR |
Structure number: | 24404 |
Old structure number: | 4880001 020 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 15 T 33 N R 27 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $117,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 60.5 |
December 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 60.5 |
December 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 60.5 |
December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 60.5 |
December 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 60.5 |
April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
February 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
February 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
January 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
February 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
February 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 30 | 60.5 |
November 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 55.5 |