COUNTY RD 8690 over MUSTIN CR

Map

Coordinates:
+36.70640, -91.81930
36°42'23" N, 91°49'09" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	COUNTY RD 8690 over MUSTIN CR
Structure number:	24837
Old structure number:	F 372R1 1 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	S 35 T 24 N R 8 W
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Total length:	77.1 ft. `[23.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	17.7 ft. `[5.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	21.0 ft. `[6.4 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1922
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	M 9 / H 10 `[1]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous `[2]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	100 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Scour condition:	Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. `[7]`
Sufficiency rating:	77.7
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$237,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
November 2018	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	100	77.7
November 2016	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	100	77.7
November 2014	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	100	77.7
February 2013	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
February 2012	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
December 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
November 2008	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
April 2007	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
October 2005	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	89.7
December 2004	Poor	Good	Satisfactory	Poor	100	41.5
July 2003	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	67.5
September 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	100	67.5
October 2000	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	7589	32.9
December 1999	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	7382	32.9
March 1999	Good	Good	Good	Good	100	67.5
October 1998	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	7382	32.9
October 1997	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	7382	32.9
November 1996	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	7192	32.9
November 1995	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	7192	32.9
October 1994	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	6843	33.8
November 1993	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	6555	33.8
September 1991	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	6591	23.0
February 1991	Good	Good	Good	Good	50	66.0