+39.17061, -94.53349
39°10'14" N, 94°32'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:25317
Old structure number:N039B41 024 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 6 T 50 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:159 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.5

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
March 201694.5Good8 out of 10-159
March 201494.5Good8 out of 10-159
April 201294.5Good8 out of 10-159
March 201083.0Good8 out of 10-900
March 200883.0Good8 out of 10-900
January 200683.0Good8 out of 10-900
March 200483.0Good8 out of 10-900
June 200283.0Good8 out of 10-900
June 200082.9Good8 out of 10-900
May 199882.9Good8 out of 10-800
June 199682.9Good9 out of 10-800
September 199482.9Good9 out of 10-800
December 199282.9Good9 out of 10-800