Share:

N BRIGHTON over BIG SHOAL CR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.22614, -94.52053
39°13'34" N, 94°31'14" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:N BRIGHTON over BIG SHOAL CR
Structure number:25335
Old structure number:N110B41 024 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 17 T 51 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Total length:125.0 ft. [38.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:7,122 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:44% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:65.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$603,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
April 2016GoodGoodGoodVery Good712265.9
April 2014GoodGoodGoodVery Good427868.5
April 2012GoodGoodGoodVery Good427868.5
April 2010GoodGoodGoodVery Good250076.5
April 2008GoodGoodGoodVery Good250076.5
January 2006GoodGoodGoodVery Good250076.5
March 2004GoodGoodGoodVery Good250076.5
June 2002GoodGoodGoodVery Good250076.5
July 2000GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good250076.5
June 1998GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good120077.7
June 1996GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good120072.7
September 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good120073.7
December 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good120073.7