+39.03915, -94.59749
39°02'21" N, 94°35'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:25433
Old structure number:S078B41 048 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 30 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Total length:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:19,100 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$934,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201665.1FairFairFairFairFO19100
April 201465.1FairFairFairFairFO19100
April 201276.4FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19100
April 201078.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19100
June 200878.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO19100
March 200678.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO19100
March 200478.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO19100
June 200278.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO19100
June 200078.1FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO11968
June 199876.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5800
July 199676.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5800
September 199477.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5800
November 199277.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5800