BELLEVIEW AVE over BRUSH CR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.03883, -94.5987639°02'20" N, 94°35'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BELLEVIEW AVE over BRUSH CR |
Structure number: | 25434 |
Old structure number: | S078B42 048 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 30 T 49 N R 33 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 88.9 ft. [27.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 48.2 ft. [14.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 13° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,400 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $621,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 2400 | 59.3 |
March 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2400 | 77.4 |
April 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2400 | 77.4 |
April 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 2400 | 88.4 |
April 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 3000 | 81.8 |
April 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 3000 | 81.8 |
March 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 3000 | 81.8 |
March 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 3000 | 81.8 |
June 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14291 | 79.1 |
June 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14291 | 78.2 |
June 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 17800 | 77.8 |
July 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 17800 | 77.8 |
September 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 17800 | 78.3 |
November 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 17800 | 76.3 |