Share: 
51ST ST over UP RR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.02847, -94.41986
39°01'42" N, 94°25'12" W
+39.02847, -94.41986
39°01'42" N, 94°25'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | 51ST ST over UP RR |
| Structure number: | 25458 |
| Location: | S 35 T 49 N R 32 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Total length: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 35° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1946 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 620 [as of 2016] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 50.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $397,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 620 | 50.3 |
| March 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 620 | 50.3 |
| April 2014 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 620 | 50.3 |
| May 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 620 | 68.4 |
| April 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2680 | 76.5 |
| June 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2680 | 76.5 |
| March 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2680 | 76.5 |
| March 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3020 | 76.4 |
| July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3020 | 76.4 |
| July 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3020 | 77.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1285079
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1285079