Share:

PAGODA CIRCLE DR over RVR DES PERES LAGO

Map

Coordinates:
+38.64197, -90.28020
38°38'31" N, 90°16'49" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PAGODA CIRCLE DR over RVR DES PERES LAGO
Structure number:28408
Location:FOREST PARK
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Total length:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,000 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:95.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2016Good8 out of 10900095.6
April 2014Good8 out of 10900095.6
April 2012Good8 out of 10900095.6
May 2010Good8 out of 10900095.6
April 2008Good8 out of 10900098.6
May 2006Good9 out of 10900098.6
April 2004Good9 out of 10900098.6
May 2002Good9 out of 10900098.6
February 2000Good9 out of 10900098.6