Share:

NW 108TH ST over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+39.28927, -94.62893
39°17'21" N, 94°37'44" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NW 108TH ST over CREEK
Structure number:28473
Location:S 29 T 52 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,354 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2018Good7 out of 10135499.9
March 2016Good8 out of 10135499.9
March 2014Good9 out of 10135499.9
April 2012Good9 out of 10135499.9
March 2010Good9 out of 10150099.9
March 2008Good9 out of 10150099.9
January 2006Good9 out of 10150099.9
March 2004Good9 out of 10150099.9
June 2002Good9 out of 10150099.9
August 2000Good9 out of 10150099.9