Share: 
RT H E over BIG BRUSHY CR
Map
Coordinates:
+37.00937, -90.76989
37°00'34" N, 90°46'12" W
+37.00937, -90.76989
37°00'34" N, 90°46'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | RT H E over BIG BRUSHY CR |
| Structure number: | 29339 |
| Location: | S 7 T 27 N R 3 E |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 125.0 ft. [38.1 m] |
| Total length: | 428.5 ft. [130.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 47° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 2002 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 246 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 98.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 246 | 98.9 |
| December 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 216 | 98.9 |
| December 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 180 | 98.9 |
| December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | 204 | 98.9 |
| December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | 222 | 98.8 |
| December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | 246 | 98.8 |
| October 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 230 | 98.8 |
| December 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 236 | 98.9 |
| December 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 214 | 98.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1286690
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1286690