RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR

Map

Coordinates:
+38.63081, -90.23506
38°37'51" N, 90°14'06" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR
Structure number:	383
Old structure number:	A 549 2 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	S 16 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) `[11]`
Length of largest span:	30.5 ft. `[9.3 m]`
Total length:	70.9 ft. `[21.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.8 ft. `[10.0 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1960
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous `[2]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	5,765 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	18% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	32.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$537,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2017	Poor	Poor	Poor	Fair	5765	32.0
July 2015	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	5613	32.0
August 2013	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	2832	38.5
August 2011	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	5891	72.8
August 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	5804	86.2
August 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	5887	88.1
August 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	5938	88.0
July 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	6077	86.8
July 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	5964	68.1
July 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	5964	65.8
June 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	5964	65.8
July 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	5964	65.8
July 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	4260	67.4
November 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	4260	67.4
February 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	4260	67.4
March 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	4260	67.4
November 1991	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	4260	67.4

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	2	2	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	82	50	29	3	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	142	141	0	1	0
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	142	0	87	55	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slab	sq. ft.	2,221	0	1,202	1,019	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,988	0	1,981	7	0