Share:

RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR

Map

Coordinates:
+38.63102, -90.22707
38°37'52" N, 90°13'37" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR
Structure number:383
Old structure number:A 549 2 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 16 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Total length:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,613 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:18% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.2 tons [72.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:32.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$537,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201532.0PoorPoorPoorSatisfactorySD5613
August 201338.5PoorPoorPoorGoodSD2832
August 201172.8FairFairFairGood-5891
August 200986.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-5804
August 200788.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-5887
August 200588.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-5938
July 200386.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-6077
July 200168.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO5964
July 199965.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO5964
June 199865.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO5964
July 199765.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO5964
July 199667.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO4260
November 199567.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO4260
February 199467.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO4260
March 199367.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO4260
November 199167.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO4260

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach22000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.82701200
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.142141010
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.142087550
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.2,22101,2021,0190
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,98801,98800