RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR

Map

Coordinates:
+38.63102, -90.22707
38°37'52" N, 90°13'37" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RP IS64E TO GRAND over FDRL SIGN CO ENTR
Structure number:	383
Old structure number:	A 549 2 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	S 16 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) `[11]`
Length of largest span:	30.5 ft. `[9.3 m]`
Total length:	70.9 ft. `[21.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.8 ft. `[10.0 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.8 ft. `[4.5 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1960
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous `[2]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	5,613 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	18% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Operating rating:	79.2 tons `[72.0 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	47.5 tons `[43.2 metric tons]`
Sufficiency rating:	32.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$537,000

Date	Suff. Rating	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	SD/FO	ADT
July 2015	32.0	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	SD	5613
August 2013	38.5	Poor	Poor	Poor	Good	SD	2832
August 2011	72.8	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	-	5891
August 2009	86.2	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	-	5804
August 2007	88.1	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	-	5887
August 2005	88.0	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	-	5938
July 2003	86.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	-	6077
July 2001	68.1	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	5964
July 1999	65.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	5964
June 1998	65.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	5964
July 1997	65.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	5964
July 1996	67.4	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	4260
November 1995	67.4	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	4260
February 1994	67.4	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	4260
March 1993	67.4	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	4260
November 1991	67.4	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Very Good	FO	4260

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1. Good	2. Fair	3. Poor	4. Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	2	2	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	82	70	12	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	142	141	0	1	0
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	142	0	87	55	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slab	sq. ft.	2,221	0	1,202	1,019	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,988	0	1,988	0	0