US 160 E over MUDDY FK OF SPRING
Map
Coordinates:
+37.43427, -94.0976637°26'03" N, 94°05'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 160 E over MUDDY FK OF SPRING |
Structure number: | 5165 |
Old structure number: | H 901 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 14 T 31 N R 29 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
Total length: | 257.9 ft. [78.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 36° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1928 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,255 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,036,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1255 | 60.6 |
July 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1184 | 73.2 |
November 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1160 | 73.2 |
November 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1432 | 72.8 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1256 | 73.1 |
December 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1546 | 72.6 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1544 | 72.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1616 | 72.5 |
December 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1644 | 72.5 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1570 | 72.6 |
October 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1766 | 72.3 |
November 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1766 | 72.3 |
October 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1766 | 70.3 |
November 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1645 | 70.5 |
November 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1582 | 71.6 |
January 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1530 | 71.7 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1530 | 72.7 |
November 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1336 | 73.0 |