MO 19 S over SPRING CR


+37.65380, -91.53551
37°39'14" N, 91°32'08" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MO 19 S over SPRING CR
Structure number:5232
Old structure number:J 70R 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 7 T 34 N R 5 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Total length:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,120 [as of 2018]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:47.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$812,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory512047.9
December 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory503447.9
December 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory471348.9
January 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory545247.9
September 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory546247.9
November 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory574848.0
November 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory558248.0
October 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory593448.0
December 2004FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory498449.0
October 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory508248.0
February 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory461649.0
November 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory580147.9
October 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory563247.9
January 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory563247.9
October 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory563247.9
December 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory599347.9
October 1995GoodGoodGoodGood599347.9
December 1994GoodGoodGoodGood482848.9
October 1993GoodGoodGoodGood474748.9
October 1992GoodGoodGoodGood474748.9
December 1991GoodGoodGoodGood431848.9