Share:

MO 240 E over SALT CR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.09293, -92.64736
39°05'35" N, 92°38'50" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MO 240 E over SALT CR
Structure number:5642
Old structure number:K 45R 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 31 T 50 N R 15 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Total length:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1932
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,566 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:53.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$501,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory256653.1
September 2015FairSatisfactoryFairGood248453.4
September 2013FairSatisfactoryFairGood240053.6
September 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood236065.9
October 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood238965.2
January 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryGood241465.2
December 2004FairGoodSatisfactoryGood250865.0
February 2003FairGoodSatisfactoryGood242851.3
November 2001FairGoodSatisfactoryGood251451.1
November 1999FairGoodSatisfactoryGood226952.0
October 1998FairGoodSatisfactoryGood226952.0
October 1997FairGoodSatisfactoryGood226950.0
December 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood212351.4
October 1994FairSatisfactoryGoodGood204151.7
February 1994FairSatisfactoryGoodGood197451.9
December 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodGood197451.9
December 1991FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGood190952.1