NINTH ST W over IS 70


+39.10325, -94.57221
39°06'12" N, 94°34'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NINTH ST W over IS 70
Structure number:6609
Old structure number:L 938 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 5 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:264.1 ft. [80.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,508 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:40.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,206,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201640.5PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD3508
September 201540.5PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD3348
September 201440.5PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD3348
September 201340.6PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD3116
September 201227.0PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD7058
September 201127.0PoorSeriousSeriousSatisfactorySD7074
February 201063.3FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO7621
January 200863.2FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO8036
November 200575.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO8547
September 200375.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9388
October 200175.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9212
September 199991.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-48787
September 199876.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9212
September 199776.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9212
September 199676.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6580
September 199576.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6580
October 199476.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6390
November 199376.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6390
October 199276.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6390
November 199176.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO6390