Share:

IS 435 S over UP RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.05292, -94.49713
39°03'11" N, 94°29'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:IS 435 S over UP RR
Structure number:747
Location:S 19 T 49 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:169.0 ft. [51.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:45,834 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.3 tons [62.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$981,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201576.2GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO45834
September 201376.2GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO45834
September 201176.4GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO43576
December 200976.3GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO45462
December 200776.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO37964
November 200576.5GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO42173
February 200576.5GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO41838
March 200442.1PoorPoorPoorFairSD41796
December 200242.1PoorPoorPoorFairSD41879
October 200140.3PoorPoorPoorFairSD57050