RT H S over CUIVRE RVR
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+39.03029, -91.0290039°01'49" N, 91°01'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RT H S over CUIVRE RVR |
Structure number: | 7499 |
Old structure number: | P 111 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 9 T 49 N R 1 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 120.4 ft. [36.7 m] |
Total length: | 303.2 ft. [92.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,928 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 2.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,929,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2015 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 1928 | 2.0 |
September 2014 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 1748 | 2.0 |
September 2013 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 1756 | 2.0 |
September 2012 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 1756 | 2.0 |
November 2011 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 1804 | 2.0 |
November 2010 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 1968 | 12.5 |
December 2009 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 1968 | 12.5 |
November 2008 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Satisfactory | 2060 | 12.5 |
December 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 2020 | 23.5 |
January 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1472 | 27.5 |
November 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1502 | 27.3 |
January 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1248 | 30.8 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2141 | 24.3 |
November 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2079 | 24.3 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2079 | 24.3 |
December 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2079 | 24.3 |
December 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1915 | 24.3 |
January 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1915 | 24.3 |
November 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1258 | 29.0 |
December 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1237 | 29.2 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1237 | 29.2 |
December 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1166 | 29.8 |