+39.41073, -91.88883
39°24'39" N, 91°53'20" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT Z S over BRUSH CR
Structure number:8082
Old structure number:R 56 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 2 T 53 N R 9 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:101.1 ft. [30.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:128 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$407,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201662.8PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD128
October 201462.7PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD178
October 201362.7PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD152
October 201262.7PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD156
December 201140.3PoorSeriousPoorSatisfactorySD156
December 201039.4PoorSeriousPoorSatisfactorySD166
December 200951.7PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD164
October 200851.7PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD172
January 200851.7PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD176
November 200555.8FairFairFairSatisfactory-174
November 200355.8FairFairFairSatisfactory-160
October 200255.8FairFairFairSatisfactory-162
December 200155.1FairFairFairSatisfactory-368
November 200045.6FairFairFairSatisfactory-245
November 199952.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-238
February 199952.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-238
October 199752.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-238
January 199752.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-254
January 199652.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-254
November 199452.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-243
December 199352.3FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-239
November 199252.3FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-239
November 199152.4FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good-221