Share:

RT Z S over BRUSH CR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.41041, -91.89118
39°24'37" N, 91°53'28" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT Z S over BRUSH CR
Structure number:8082
Old structure number:R 56 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 2 T 53 N R 9 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:101.1 ft. [30.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:128 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:62.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$407,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2016PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGood12862.8
October 2014PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGood17862.7
October 2013PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGood15262.7
October 2012PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGood15662.7
December 2011PoorSeriousPoorSatisfactory15640.3
December 2010PoorSeriousPoorSatisfactory16639.4
December 2009PoorSeriousFairSatisfactory16451.7
October 2008PoorSeriousFairSatisfactory17251.7
January 2008PoorSeriousFairSatisfactory17651.7
November 2005FairFairFairSatisfactory17455.8
November 2003FairFairFairSatisfactory16055.8
October 2002FairFairFairSatisfactory16255.8
December 2001FairFairFairSatisfactory36855.1
November 2000FairFairFairSatisfactory24545.6
November 1999FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory23852.8
February 1999FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory23852.8
October 1997FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory23852.8
January 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25452.3
January 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25452.3
November 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24352.3
December 1993FairSatisfactoryGoodGood23952.3
November 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodGood23952.3
November 1991FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good22152.4