+38.10649, -90.53464
38°06'23" N, 90°32'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:9041
Old structure number:T 223 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 4 T 38 N R 5 E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1936
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:564 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$255,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
December 201661.6Poor4 out of 10SD564
December 201446.9Poor4 out of 10SD520
December 201262.6Fair5 out of 10-514
January 201162.4Fair5 out of 10-570
December 200862.4Fair5 out of 10-564
November 200664.1Fair5 out of 10-324
November 200464.1Fair5 out of 10-324
November 200264.3Fair5 out of 10-270
November 200064.4Fair5 out of 10-225
November 199864.4Fair5 out of 10-218
January 199774.4Fair6 out of 10-273
December 199474.4Fair6 out of 10-283
October 199289.4Good7 out of 10-278
June 199066.7Good7 out of 10-262