MO 142 E over FOURCHE CR
Map
Coordinates:
+36.58447, -90.9842436°35'04" N, 90°59'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MO 142 E over FOURCHE CR |
Structure number: | 9303 |
Old structure number: | T 824 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 5 T 22 N R 1 E |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Total length: | 128.0 ft. [39.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,216 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 31.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $819,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1216 | 31.4 |
January 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1178 | 44.6 |
January 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1260 | 44.0 |
January 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1274 | 30.9 |
January 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1242 | 32.7 |
December 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1260 | 32.5 |
December 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1344 | 31.8 |
October 2005 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1264 | 32.5 |
January 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1288 | 32.3 |
October 2001 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1518 | 30.3 |
December 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1319 | 30.5 |
November 1999 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1281 | 30.8 |
November 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1281 | 30.8 |
October 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1281 | 30.8 |
November 1996 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1180 | 31.7 |
October 1995 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 1180 | 31.8 |
January 1995 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 978 | 36.2 |
December 1993 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 962 | 36.3 |
October 1992 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 962 | 36.3 |
October 1991 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 907 | 36.8 |