US 80 over CREEK


+32.35137, -89.33852
32°21'05" N, 89°20'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 80 over CREEK
Structure number:210008006209700
Location:1.0 MI W SR 489
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,300 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:53.4 tons [48.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.0 tons [29.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:68.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$921,000,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201768.8GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO3300
January 201568.7GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO3400
January 201366.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3400
December 201066.1FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3900
November 200867.1FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3900
November 200667.2FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3800
January 200570.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3200
February 200370.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO3200
January 200166.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO5700
February 199966.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO5700
April 199766.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO5700
April 199553.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO5500
October 199153.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO5090
December 198957.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO2540