SR 184 over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+31.67195, -88.6572831°40'19" N, 88°39'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 184 over STREAM |
Structure number: | 210008407717930 |
Location: | 0.5 MI W SR 63 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 7.9 ft. [2.4 m] |
Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1939 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,200 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.6 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $194,000,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6200 | 98.6 |
September 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5900 | 98.6 |
September 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 6000 | 87.4 |
September 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 7100 | 87.1 |
September 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7100 | 98.3 |
September 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6900 | 98.4 |
February 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 7800 | 98.2 |
February 2004 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2700 | 99.4 |
February 2002 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 99.8 |
February 2000 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6790 | 79.0 |
March 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6790 | 79.0 |
April 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 6790 | 71.5 |
April 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 6790 | 71.5 |
July 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 6790 | 71.5 |
September 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 6790 | 64.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 180 | 152 | 18 | 10 | 0 |