SR 3 over LOST LAKE BAYOU
Map
Coordinates:
+34.78863, -90.2441634°47'19" N, 90°14'39" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 3 over LOST LAKE BAYOU |
Structure number: | 310000307219570 |
Location: | 11.0 MI N SR 4 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.2 ft. [8.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 870 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $939,000,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 870 | 82.3 |
November 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1800 | 79.1 |
November 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 74.6 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 71.9 |
November 2009 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2400 | 72.4 |
November 2007 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2400 | 72.4 |
November 2005 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2900 | 73.1 |
November 2003 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 73.9 |
November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2400 | 74.4 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 74.8 |
November 1997 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 74.8 |
November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 810 | 69.2 |
November 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 810 | 69.2 |
November 1992 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 810 | 69.2 |
November 1990 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 810 | 69.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 78 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 71 | 57 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 60 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 195 | 164 | 15 | 16 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,625 | 2,187 | 428 | 10 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 345 | 345 | 0 | 0 | 0 |