Share:

SR 9 over MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.40978, -89.23041
33°24'35" N, 89°13'49" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 9 over MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK
Structure number:310000901000720
Location:7.2 MI N SR 12
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,700 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:46.0 tons [41.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.4 tons [24.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.8

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
March 201691.8Good7 out of 10-1700
February 201491.6Good7 out of 10-1900
February 201291.7Good7 out of 10-1800
May 201091.7Good7 out of 10-1800
November 200891.6Good8 out of 10-1900
December 200691.6Good8 out of 10-1900
December 200491.4Good8 out of 10-2100
October 200291.5Good8 out of 10-2000
September 200092.3Good8 out of 10-1120
September 199892.3Good8 out of 10-1120
October 199691.5Good8 out of 10-1120
November 199489.5Good8 out of 10-1120
April 199389.5Good8 out of 10-1120
April 199182.5Good8 out of 10-1120