Share:

CO. ROAD 3232 over SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+33.15211, -89.61989
33°09'08" N, 89°37'12" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO. ROAD 3232 over SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:SA0400000000110
Location:SEC 19 T15N R 7E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Total length:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:60 [as of 2013]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:53.1 tons [48.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.8

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
November 201597.8Good8 out of 10-60
November 2013100.0Good8 out of 10-60
November 2011100.0Good8 out of 10-60
December 2009100.0Good8 out of 10-60
December 2007100.0Good8 out of 10-60
January 2006100.0Good8 out of 10-60
December 2003100.0Good8 out of 10-60
January 2002100.0Good9 out of 10-60
January 2000100.0Good9 out of 10-60
January 199824.4PoorN out of 10SD60
July 199626.4PoorN out of 10SD60