+33.89010, -88.95446
33°53'24" N, 88°57'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 100 over TRIB OF HOULKA CK
Structure number:SA0900000000100
Location:SEC 2 T14S R 3E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201599.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
October 201399.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
October 201178.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
September 200978.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
November 200878.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
September 200725.4PoorSatisfactoryFairImminent FailureSD50
November 200629.4PoorSatisfactoryFairCriticalSD50
September 200529.4PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD50
September 200429.4PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD50
December 200329.4PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD50
November 200132.3FairSatisfactoryFairFairSD50
January 200142.3FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodSD50
November 199945.5FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodSD50
February 199945.5GoodGoodGoodGoodSD50
December 199745.5GoodGoodGoodGoodSD50
December 199547.6GoodVery GoodGoodGoodSD50