+33.48413, -89.17733
33°29'03" N, 89°10'38" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:SA1000000000088
Location:SEC 30 T19N R11E B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:13.8 tons [12.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:10.3 tons [9.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:32.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$300,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201632.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201532.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201432.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201332.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201232.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201132.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD50
November 201036.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
November 200936.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
November 200836.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
October 200736.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
January 200736.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
December 200536.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
February 200536.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
November 200336.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
January 200236.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
January 200136.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
January 200036.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
January 199936.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50
February 199736.8FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD50