+32.29763, -90.22730
32°17'51" N, 90°13'38" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:SA2500000000116
Location:SEC 5 T 5N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.3 ft. [19.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,000 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:69.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$276,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201769.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO14000
February 201569.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 201369.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 201169.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 201069.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
November 200777.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
November 200577.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 200477.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 200277.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO14000
February 200076.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO16660
March 199876.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO16660
April 199676.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO16660