+32.25658, -90.21429
32°15'24" N, 90°12'51" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:SA2500000000147
Location:SEC 20 T 5N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:780 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:12.2 tons [11.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.5 tons [7.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:27.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$208,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201727.6FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201627.6FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201527.6FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201427.6FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201325.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201225.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201125.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
February 201025.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
January 200925.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
November 200725.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
January 200725.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
December 200525.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairSD780
January 200535.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactorySD780
February 200435.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactorySD780
January 200236.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD780
December 200036.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD1400
February 200036.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD1260
February 199936.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD1260
March 199841.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactorySD1260
April 199641.8FairGoodGoodSatisfactorySD1260