Share:

COUNTY LINE RD over SMALL STREAM

Map

Coordinates:
+32.40019, -90.19900
32°24'01" N, 90°11'56" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY LINE RD over SMALL STREAM
Structure number:SA2500000000193
Location:SEC 4 T 6N R 1E B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,200 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:74.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2018GoodGoodGoodGood720074.2
February 2017GoodGoodGoodGood720049.4
February 2016GoodGoodGoodGood720049.4
February 2015GoodGoodGoodGood720049.4
February 2013GoodGoodGoodGood720049.4
February 2011GoodGoodGoodGood720051.4
February 2010GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood720051.4
November 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood640050.7
November 2005GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood520051.3
February 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood520051.3
January 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good430052.8
February 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good420052.8
March 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good420052.8
April 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good420052.8