Share:

CULLEY DR over TRIB HANGING MOSS CR

Map

Coordinates:
+32.37792, -90.16008
32°22'41" N, 90°09'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CULLEY DR over TRIB HANGING MOSS CR
Structure number:SA2500000000209
Location:SEC 11 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:520 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:84.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2017GoodGoodGoodGood52084.9
February 2016GoodGoodGoodGood52063.2
February 2014GoodGoodGoodGood52063.2
February 2012GoodGoodGoodGood52063.2
February 2010GoodGoodVery GoodGood52063.2
November 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good52063.2
November 2005GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good52063.2
February 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good52063.2
February 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good42059.2
February 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good39057.2
March 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good39057.2
April 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good39057.2