+32.33963, -90.23055
32°20'23" N, 90°13'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000244
Location:SEC 30 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B]
Average daily traffic:110 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.5 tons [4.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:33.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201733.0PoorGoodGoodPoorSD110
February 201681.0FairGoodGoodFair-110
February 201581.0FairGoodGoodFair-110
February 201481.0FairGoodGoodFair-110
February 201368.5FairGoodGoodFair-100
February 201268.5FairGoodGoodFair-100
February 201168.5FairGoodGoodFair-100
February 201068.5FairGoodGoodFair-100
November 200752.5FairGoodGoodFair-400
November 200561.4FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactory-606
February 200461.4GoodVery GoodGoodGood-606
February 200249.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-460
February 200050.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-450
March 199850.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-450
April 199650.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-450