+32.31562, -90.23369
32°18'56" N, 90°14'01" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:SA2500000000245
Location:SEC 31 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:520 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:11.8 tons [10.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.0 tons [7.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:55.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$158,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201755.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201655.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201555.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201455.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201355.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201255.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodSD520
February 201143.7FairGoodGoodFairSD520
February 201043.7FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-520
January 200943.4FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1500
November 200743.4FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1500
January 200743.5FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1460
November 200543.5FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1460
January 200543.5FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1460
February 200443.5FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1460
February 200240.6FairVery GoodVery GoodFair-1460
December 200039.5FairFairFairFairSD1450
February 200039.5FairFairFairFairSD1450
February 199939.5FairFairFairFairSD1450
March 199839.5FairFairFairSatisfactorySD1450
April 199651.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactorySD1450