Share:

LAUREL ST over LARGE STREAM

Map

Coordinates:
+32.31867, -90.16239
32°19'07" N, 90°09'45" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LAUREL ST over LARGE STREAM
Structure number:SA2500000000266
Location:SEC 35 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:970 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
November 2017Good7 out of 1097099.9
February 2016Good7 out of 1097099.9
February 2014Good7 out of 1097099.9
February 2012Good7 out of 1097099.9
February 2010Good8 out of 1097099.9
November 2007Good8 out of 1097099.9
November 2005Good8 out of 1097099.9
February 2004Good8 out of 1097099.9
January 2002Good8 out of 1097099.9
February 2000Good8 out of 1095099.9
March 1998Good8 out of 1095099.9
April 1996Good8 out of 1095099.9