Share:

LINBERG DR over LYNCH CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.32298, -90.24415
32°19'23" N, 90°14'39" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LINBERG DR over LYNCH CREEK
Structure number:SA2500000000268
Location:SEC 36 T 6N R 1W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:360 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201692.5Good7 out of 10-360
February 201492.5Good7 out of 10-360
February 201291.5Good7 out of 10-360
February 201091.5Good8 out of 10-360
November 200799.0Good8 out of 10-360
November 200599.0Good8 out of 10-360
February 200499.0Good8 out of 10-360
January 2002100.0Good8 out of 10-360
February 2000100.0Good8 out of 10-340
March 1998100.0Good8 out of 10-340
April 1996100.0Good8 out of 10-340