Share:

WESTBROOK RD over PURPLE CR

Map

Coordinates:
+32.37054, -90.11006
32°22'14" N, 90°06'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:WESTBROOK RD over PURPLE CR
Structure number:SA2500000000284
Location:SEC 17 T 6N R 2E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:40 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:13.2 tons [12.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.8 tons [8.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$261,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201751.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201651.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201551.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201451.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201351.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201251.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201151.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySD40
February 201051.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
January 200951.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
November 200751.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
January 200751.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
November 200551.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
December 200451.0GoodGoodGoodGoodSD40
February 200451.0GoodGoodGoodGood-40
February 200251.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-40
December 200048.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-180
February 200048.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-180
February 199948.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-180
March 199851.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-180
April 199661.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-180