Share:

ST. THOMAS ROAD over BAKERS CR

Map

Coordinates:
+32.33475, -90.44831
32°20'05" N, 90°26'54" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ST. THOMAS ROAD over BAKERS CR
Structure number:SA2500000000291
Location:SEC 30 T 6N R 2W B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Total length:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:150 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:42.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$358,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15042.1
February 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory15042.1
February 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodGood15042.1
February 2011GoodGoodGoodGood15042.1
February 2010GoodGoodGoodGood15042.1
November 2007GoodGoodGoodGood15042.1
November 2005GoodGoodGoodGood15042.1
December 2004GoodGoodGoodGood15042.1
February 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood15039.4
January 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood15040.4
February 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood14041.4
March 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good14039.4
April 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good14039.4