Share:

RATLIFF RD over RELIEF BOGUE CHITTO CR

Map

Coordinates:
+32.43197, -90.33394
32°25'55" N, 90°20'02" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RATLIFF RD over RELIEF BOGUE CHITTO CR
Structure number:SA2500000000321
Location:SEC 19 T 7N R 1W B
Purpose:Carries highway over relief for waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:850 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:88.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2017GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85088.5
February 2016GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85088.5
February 2014GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85088.5
February 2012GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85066.9
February 2010GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85066.9
November 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85066.9
December 2005GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good85066.9
February 2004GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good85064.9
January 2002GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good85064.9
February 2000GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good84064.9
March 1998GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good84064.9
April 1996GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good84064.9