Share:

FLAG CHAPEL ROAD over BOGUE CHITTO CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.36597, -90.26575
32°21'57" N, 90°15'57" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FLAG CHAPEL ROAD over BOGUE CHITTO CREEK
Structure number:SA2500000000409
Location:SEC 14 T 6N R 1W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1976
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B]
Average daily traffic:5,000 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:18.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$175,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2017FairGoodGoodFair500018.0
February 2017FairGoodGoodFair500066.1
February 2016FairGoodGoodFair500066.1
February 2015FairGoodGoodFair500066.1
February 2014FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500077.4
February 2012FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500055.3
February 2010FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500054.3
November 2007FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500057.3
November 2005FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500057.3
February 2004FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500056.2
March 2002FairGoodGoodSatisfactory500055.2