Share:

OLD WIRE ROAD over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.34333, -88.56000
32°20'36" N, 88°33'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:OLD WIRE ROAD over CREEK
Structure number:SA3800000000136
Location:SEC 21 T 6N R17E B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:67.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$310,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2016FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory20067.6
November 2014FairGoodGoodSatisfactory18067.7
November 2012FairGoodGoodSatisfactory18077.8
November 2010GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
October 2009GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
October 2007GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
February 2006GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
February 2004GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
February 2002GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
January 2000GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
February 1998GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4
May 1996GoodGoodGoodVery Good18068.4