+32.38947, -89.32382
32°23'22" N, 89°19'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA6200000000046
Location:SEC 1 T 6N R 9E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:300 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:81.6 tons [74.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.8 tons [44.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$580,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201699.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
December 201499.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
December 201283.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
January 201199.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
December 200999.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
January 200899.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
September 200599.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
December 200399.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-300
December 200199.8GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-300
December 200025.9PoorSatisfactoryGoodPoorSD300
December 199925.9PoorSatisfactoryGoodPoorSD300
December 199824.8PoorFairVery GoodPoorSD300
December 199724.8PoorFairVery GoodPoorSD300
December 199524.8PoorFairVery GoodPoorSD300