Share:

GREER ROAD over DITCH NO 8

Map

Coordinates:
+33.14716, -90.75324
33°08'50" N, 90°45'12" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:GREER ROAD over DITCH NO 8
Structure number:SA7600000000026
Location:SEC 18 T15N R 5W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Bridge closed to all traffic [K]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2016]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Critical [2 out of 9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:37.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$273,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201637.9PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryCriticalSD50
January 201563.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-50
January 201363.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-50
January 201159.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-50
January 201062.8FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
February 200862.8FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
February 200662.8FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
January 200462.8FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
March 200262.7FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
February 200062.7FairSatisfactoryFairFair-50
January 199872.8FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-50
March 199672.8GoodGoodGoodGood-50