+33.17699, -90.89939
33°10'37" N, 90°53'58" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:SA7600000000065
Location:SEC 3 T15N R 7W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:82.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$304,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201682.0FairFairFairSatisfactory-50
January 201582.0FairFairFairSatisfactory-50
January 201362.5FairFairFairSatisfactory-50
January 201162.5FairFairFairGood-50
January 201059.5FairSatisfactoryFairGood-50
February 200859.5FairSatisfactoryFairGood-50
January 200759.5FairSatisfactoryFairGood-50
February 200630.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
February 200530.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
January 200430.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
February 200230.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
March 200130.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
February 200030.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
March 199930.9PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD50
February 199667.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-50