Share: 
SMTHTWN CHICORA RD over LITTLE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+31.46994, -88.65028
31°28'12" N, 88°39'01" W
+31.46994, -88.65028
31°28'12" N, 88°39'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SMTHTWN CHICORA RD over LITTLE CREEK |
| Structure number: | SA7700000000017 |
| Location: | SEC 24 T 6N R 7W B |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 43.6 ft. [13.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1999 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2015] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| September 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| September 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| September 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| September 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| August 2007 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| October 2005 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| January 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| December 2001 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| January 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 50 | 100.0 |
| January 1999 | Poor | N out of 10 | 50 | 34.8 |
| January 1998 | Poor | N out of 10 | 50 | 34.8 |
| February 1997 | Poor | N out of 10 | 50 | 34.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1313291
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1313291