LAMBARD RD over BROADWATER MISSOURI 018
Map
Coordinates:
+46.15941, -111.4335546°09'34" N, 111°26'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LAMBARD RD over BROADWATER MISSOURI 018 |
Structure number: | L04401001+09001 |
Location: | 1M SE TOSTON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2004] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 84.0 |
November 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 85.0 |
November 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 85.0 |
November 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 85.0 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.0 |
January 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 86.0 |
January 2006 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 76.8 |
February 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.8 |
November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.8 |
February 2000 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.8 |
March 1998 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.8 |
December 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 96 | 74.1 |
July 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 74.1 |
April 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 74.1 |
February 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 74.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 167 | 163 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 549 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 85 | 81 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 49 | 43 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 167 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 237 | 237 | 0 | 0 | 0 |