DRY HOLLOW RD over BROADWATER MISSOURI 015
Map
Coordinates:
+46.22412, -111.4488946°13'27" N, 111°26'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | DRY HOLLOW RD over BROADWATER MISSOURI 015 |
Structure number: | L04413000+01001 |
Location: | 3M N TOSTON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2004] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 89.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 89.8 |
December 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 90.8 |
December 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 90.8 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
January 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
January 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 91.8 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 91.8 |
February 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
November 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
March 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 90.8 |
January 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 31 | 89.3 |
July 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 31 | 90.3 |
April 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 31 | 91.1 |
February 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 31 | 76.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 167 | 165 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 549 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 69 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 0 |