OLD US 91 over NOVAK CREEK 005
Map
Coordinates:
+47.15340, -111.8336147°09'12" N, 111°50'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD US 91 over NOVAK CREEK 005 |
Structure number: | L07604005+00001 |
Location: | 12M S CASCADE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Total length: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1931 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 330 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $73,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 330 | 63.8 |
January 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 78.6 |
January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 78.6 |
January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 78.6 |
January 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 78.6 |
December 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 79.6 |
December 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 63.5 |
January 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 63.5 |
January 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 63.5 |
July 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 61.5 |
November 1996 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 100 | 61.5 |
February 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 252 | 48.1 |
September 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 252 | 48.1 |
January 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 31 | 57.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 177 | 151 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,109 | 1,062 | 0 | 47 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,109 | 1,109 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 59 | 44 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 26 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 89 | 80 | 9 | 0 | 0 |