US 2 over COTTONWOOD CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+48.51401, -110.9586248°30'50" N, 110°57'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 2 over COTTONWOOD CREEK |
Structure number: | P00001322+03991 |
Location: | CHESTER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 58.1 ft. [17.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1953 |
Year reconstructed: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,382 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2382 | 76.0 |
February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2010 | 76.0 |
February 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2010 | 77.1 |
February 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2010 | 77.1 |
February 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2080 | 78.1 |
February 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2380 | 77.1 |
February 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 71.6 |
April 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2990 | 71.6 |
March 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1320 | 71.6 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 600 | 76.5 |
May 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2306 | 69.6 |
May 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2075 | 69.5 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2322 | 69.5 |
February 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1932 | 69.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,335 | 1,055 | 242 | 38 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Column | each | 42 | 13 | 26 | 3 | 0 |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 167 | 153 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 217 | 70 | 147 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 3,014 | 2,989 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,014 | 2,626 | 388 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 115 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 763 | 763 | 0 | 0 | 0 |