US 12 over DEEP CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+46.32774, -111.2779046°19'40" N, 111°16'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 12 over DEEP CREEK |
Structure number: | P00014011+09751 |
Location: | 11M E TOWNSEND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Total length: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2015 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 700 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 87.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 87.4 |
October 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 860 | 78.9 |
October 2013 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 1250 | 49.1 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1250 | 59.2 |
November 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1210 | 63.1 |
October 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1240 | 62.8 |
October 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 1040 | 34.9 |
October 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 930 | 34.9 |
August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 930 | 59.0 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 790 | 60.8 |
March 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1000 | 58.1 |
December 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 667 | 68.8 |
May 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 637 | 67.1 |
June 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 528 | 60.6 |
January 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 471 | 60.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 144 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 520 | 510 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,303 | 2,303 | 0 | 0 | 0 |