US 87 over OTTER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+47.26350, -110.7150447°15'49" N, 110°42'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 87 over OTTER CREEK |
Structure number: | P00057010+08831 |
Location: | 1M SE RAYNESFORD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
Total length: | 83.0 ft. [25.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,513 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $165,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2513 | 69.5 |
June 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1970 | 71.5 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2070 | 70.5 |
June 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2070 | 70.5 |
July 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2070 | 70.5 |
June 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1980 | 71.5 |
May 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2560 | 70.5 |
September 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 2190 | 67.3 |
April 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2280 | 65.5 |
March 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1800 | 66.5 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1750 | 66.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 331 | 331 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,594 | 2,594 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,594 | 2,594 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 88 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 33 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 167 | 150 | 15 | 2 | 0 |